Thank you Annelies that is great and a real good start to add to the baseline
1. I note the narrative from INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: ONE WORLD, MANY THEORIES , By: Walt, Stephen M., Foreign Policy, 00157228, Spring98, Issue 110 covers p29, 17p
Where Are We Coming From? , Realism , Liberalism , Radical Approaches , Domestic Politics, New Wrinkles in Old Paradigms , Realism Redux , New Life for Liberalism , Constructivist Theories , Domestic Politics Reconsidered , Tomorrow's Conceptual Toolbox , Want to Know More? , Waiting for Mr. X
2. The chart at the end for COMPETING PARADIGMS covers:
2.a Realism , Liberalism and Constructivist Theories
2.b the following Cells are included:
- Main Theoretical Proposition,
- Main Units of Analysis,
- Main Instruments,
- Modern Theorists,
- Representative Modern Works,
- Post-Cold War,
- Main Limitation,
3. I propose we extend the chart in two ways:
3.a - add other paradigms
[ marxism, structural realism, neorealism - suggestions?]
3.c - Additional cells
[Kodjoe's from class - I could use some help in wording this
- [Purpose of the Theory,
- Basic assumptions,
- Definition of power,
- How measure success of Theory,
- Motivation of Actors, - Actors Interest - National Interest ,
- Discussion of Foreign relations [objective of Foreign Relations,]
- What factors account for Change and Stability in the system [How stable is it],
- Prescriptions?,
- Reliability,
I will begin to format in next few days and welcome suggestions for wording of cells [rows or columns headings] or contents and additions etc. If you have a source please provide and I will note in reference column..
Work in Progress at http://www.sharework.net/www/cuny-gc/intl-pol-draft-notes-docs-outlines.html
- Adhiratha [adhiratha@aol.com]
AKamran@gc.cuny.edu writes:
As promised! I'm not too sure about the legality of posting it, though, so
I've copied everyone on Letizia's email list.
Annelies